TexasCHLforum.com

philip964 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:51 pm

thatguyoverthere wrote: ↑Wed Sep 04, 2019 2:06 pm Interesting.

Your suggestion is interesting, but I was more referring to my response to your question.

I had typed out a long well stated (IMHO) response and reasoning and my feelings about several related subjects. But after reflecting on what I had written, and considering today's climate, let me considerably edit my response to your question.

Here is my response: no.

But it did solicit a better idea. Give private gun sellers access to the database.

Not mandatory but allow access.

I like that.

I will make that my suggestion to the politicians.

Thanks all!!

Sounds great! People who date will vet people with the database. Employers will use the database. Facebook, And social media will use the database. EVERYONE WILL!

LET ME ASK YOU ONE QUESTION. WHO controls this data base? Comey, Struck, Page, Tec company owners who can “flag” bad behavior, and all the other raging liberals?????

Once your on this list for some reason or another, can you appeal and get off it? How much time and lawyer expense will this cost or do you have to get a psychological evaluation by a government official?
If this is the case, why not just have everyone on the list FIRST!!! Then the government can make sure to their qualifications that ONLY the ones THEY SAY can have a firearm like in Hawaii, New York City, Chicago, Mexico ETC.
Of course, its only common Since to take away all firearms until this evaluation can be done, only to get started Of course!!

This ends with everyone in the country having to see government phycologists yearly and being told what they can and cannot do. If you are deemed a threat, you are shipped off to a wood chipper!
Book- brave new world