TexasCHLforum.com

jrs_diesel wrote: ↑Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:53 am With the elections going on, this flew under the radar. Doubt the media will report on this much:

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/ ... nfirmation

“The revelation of last minute allegations tested the committee in many ways. But these investigative efforts rose to the occasion and were critical to helping us obtain the truth. This was a serious and thorough investigation that left no stone unturned in our pursuit of the facts,” Grassley said. “In the end, there was no credible evidence to support the allegations against the nominee.”

jason812 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:41 pm Maybe Barrett will be nominated as Ginsburg's replacement. You know the left will demand a woman.

bblhd672 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 27, 2018 4:37 pm

WTR wrote: ↑Wed Jun 27, 2018 4:21 pm

TreyHouston wrote: ↑Wed Jun 27, 2018 3:45 pm There is NO WAY Ginsburg can make it another 6 years. No way!!

My Mom and my MIL are both 87. I hope you are wrong.

Today is my mother's 95th birthday, so you never know.

Ginsberg departing in any fashion would be double good news.

03Lightningrocks wrote: ↑Wed Jun 27, 2018 4:04 pm Now the Democrats are saying the selection should be put on hold. The very same ones who said it should not be for president election. But somehow a mid term congressional race is reason to hold? Unreal!