I heard many countries in Europe require them if you go hunting. Could become another charge!The Annoyed Man wrote:This^^^The Wall wrote:I don't know why they need to be registered, regulated or licensed period for anyone. I wish people would quit calling them silencers. There's no such thing. They suppress not silence. And without the right ammo they don't do a very good job of that either. Why don't they license and register camouflaged guns since they are harder to see? Just liked suppressed guns are harder to hear.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?”
- Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:37 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
- Replies: 19
- Views: 15454