Search found 2 matches

by MikeyJ
Thu May 19, 2016 12:42 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: D.C. must generally grant gun-carry licenses to law-abiding adults
Replies: 16
Views: 3357

Re: D.C. must generally grant gun-carry licenses to law-abiding adults

puma guy wrote:
MikeyJ wrote:
puma guy wrote:Do they have a chapter in New Jersey?
As far as the case goes, the "good cause" specified by the plaintiff was the Second Amendment, not membership in Pink Pistols.
Yes, I was posting in jest. I should have included an emoticon. NJ makes it difficult for anyone to get a CCL regardless of good cause or need OR the Second Amendment. A police chief can decide you don't need a license, since NJ is a "may Issue" state. Maybe the Pink Pistol group can get it done in NJ. :lol:
When I read through the memo, I thought there was a reference to many group members belonging to a "sexual minority" and, therefore, more likely to be targeted.

NJ would be a good test case, though. Chris Christie claims to want to remove the "good cause" requirement but the democrat controlled legislature won't budge. I don't know if the 3rd Circuit has already ruled on a challenge to the "good cause" requirement, though, or how vigorously the NJ AG would defend the requirement.
by MikeyJ
Wed May 18, 2016 9:21 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: D.C. must generally grant gun-carry licenses to law-abiding adults
Replies: 16
Views: 3357

Re: D.C. must generally grant gun-carry licenses to law-abiding adults

puma guy wrote:Do they have a chapter in New Jersey?
As far as the case goes, the "good cause" specified by the plaintiff was the Second Amendment, not membership in Pink Pistols.

Return to “D.C. must generally grant gun-carry licenses to law-abiding adults”