Scott in Houston wrote:I think SIRIT makes a good point. Another parallel is the fact that before this policy the only "REAL" protection for bathroom safety was a SIGN!!!
I agree, however, with this new ruling you don't have to "appear" to be a woman, or be "dressed" as as woman, you merely have to feel like a woman on the inside. So, if someone (employee) were to question the obvious man walking into the ladies room, they have now violated his "right to gender identity" and probably some employer's policy and will then be subjected to mandatory "sensitivity training. It's a slippery slope to be sure.