sjfcontrol wrote:
I seriously doubt that the "Motion Picture Association of America" would have much to say about authority to carry a handgun -- well, except maybe in a movie.
Some would argue (not me!) that you give up the right to carry under MPA when you get your CHL.
Ack, it looks like I gave out an extra A. I hope my professors are as generous!
As for a CHL not receiving the benefit of the MPA, I don't see anything at all to lead to that conclusion. Having a license gives you an exemption from 46.02 as long as you meet the requirements (carrying the license and a concealed handgun of the category licensed).
If for some reason you don't meet those requirements, then 46.02, in its entirety, would apply. Why would a portion of 46.02 (the basis for charging you) apply, but other portions of it (the exception for carrying in your vehicle) not apply?
I agree that the car carry portion of the MPA doesn't normally apply to CHLs (who are carrying a license and a concealed handgun) since it is a portion of 46.02 and 46.15 specifically says that 46.02 doesn't apply to them. But if, for any reason, 46.02 does apply (like you forget your license)... then the entire thing would apply, including the car carry exemption.