The whole idea sounds like an exercise in futility. If you are bound by rule to appoint an equal number of people diametrically opposed, what can you expect the outcome to be? It would be like appointing 8 Glock owners and 8 1911 owners and having them decide which one is the best.
No, I'm not stirring that pot again, just making a point.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5508/b5508f8a183c0449de230eca4e2b8782220adba0" alt="tiphat :tiphat:"