Abraham wrote:Jusme,
So, these pro-gun academics should lie low because speaking up pro-gun would be too much sacrifice?
I understand that being timid, meek and mild goes a long way to promote the anti-gun agenda.
Spare me your defense of the "Don't Rock The Boat or We'll Suffer Agenda".
You posted: "There is a very large contingent of campus carry advocates in the student population" - so let them carry the water, eh? They have so little to lose, while the pro-gun academics could, gulp, be in hot water... Oh my, my, we can't have that.
Ever consider that if more pro-gun academics spoke up it would greatly help the cause of being pro-self defense? Maybe if there were enough academic voices, it just might tone down the academic anti-gun folks?
As long as these pro-gun academics sit on their hands and let others speak up, while they remain mum, I remain disgusted by their gutlessness.
WildBill,
I would heartily agree if the anti-gun academics kept quiet, but they don't.
They clamor, rage, and rave against pro-gun self defense while the pro-gun academics don't look up from their reading, hoping like crazy they aren't called upon to stand up to the anti-gun zealots.
Therefore, it's incumbent upon the pro-gun academics to get off their duffs, reluctant as they are and speak up, cuz the anti's among them aren't gonna be quiet about their radical opinions.
Abraham I never insinuated that Sugarland Dave should not voice his opinion, I think he has done that, now whether he should take a public stance or not that is his choice to make and I will never criticize his decision one way or the other. My point was in response to your comment that it would make national news if he publicly came out as a pro campus carry advocate. We have all seen the treatment given to pro carry advocates and the media likes to lump everybody together with groups that carry AR15S and AK47S even though the new laws only apply to LTC holders, and handguns. You yourself have posted on other threads that you were tired of trying to convince others of the virtues of carrying, and were critical of UT personnel who expressed views in opposition of yours.
Why to you now advocate UT personnel publicly make statements because they are more in line with your views?
I don't have a dog in the hunt at UT I don't work there and none of my children have plans to attend there.
It really doesn't matter what you, I, or anyone else thinks about the campus carry law, it is the law, or will be in August.