TexasCHLforum.com

imkopaka wrote: ↑Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:26 am Wait, I'm confused. How does being on government property factor into the validity of the signage? I thought the AG opinion RE: Dallas Zoo basically said that private entities operating on government property have the authority to post valid signs. Am I missing something?

Alas. It's complicated. My understanding of the Dallas Zoo opinion is that, in effect, being classified as an amusement park (which the Dallas zoo has gotten away with) trumps the ban on 30.06/30.07 signs on government property. So the ban still stands on government property unless the operator can establish the property qualifies as an amusement park.

surprise_i'm_armed wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 2:58 pm Some time ago on the board, someone mentioned that an organization called something like "Texas Hospitals Association" or some similar umbrella name, recommended that all Texas hospitals post both 30.06 and 30.07 as part of "best practices". All Texas hospitals seem to adhere to this practice.

That's the sort of thing I figured was out there.

Rob72 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 1:20 pm Most "Facilities" are part of a larger healthcare organization, so the organization's standards will apply to affiliated Physician Clinics. Private practices are generally an LLC or similar, and adopt office rules that, subjectively, lower liability. Very, very few docs are truly "Private" anymore, the liability is just too high.

In my experience, virtually any healthcare or medical related facility will be posted. Doctors have to have enough individual variety that this isn't a coincidence. There must be some mandate somewhere.

Does anyone know where?