TexasCHLforum.com

What's your tolerance for risk? As you can see from the discussion so far, you can make interesting arguments that you should be OK. But interesting arguments are no guarantee of winning, and the consequences of losing are severe. I myself would want more than an interesting argument to support me.

Judges may be reluctant to go too far down the path of interesting arguments because they know doing so can lead to counter-intuitive results. In the spirit of the "fun question," follow this link and read the humorous piece to see how what seems logical in one case can be expanded to undermine a rule almost entirely.
http://www.greenbag.org/v12n3/v12n3_levin.pdf