Search found 6 matches

by badkarma56
Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:35 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Springfield Armory EMP...Very Impressive!
Replies: 21
Views: 4370

5111 wrote:I also have a Concealco holster and am very happy with it....Just don't expect any customer service to go with it. It says right there on the site that he doesn't do customer service.
Yep, Andrew can be a tough rascal to get a hold of, but he really is a good guy. He will also stand behind his work if necessary (no trouble with my rigs though).

You have to call him in the middle of the night to reach him (that's when he's up and about). I spoke with him for the first time this past July, prior to ordering my first holster, but I had to call at 1:30 a.m. to catch him. :shock: I remember talkin' guns and gear with him for about two hours that night!
by badkarma56
Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:29 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Springfield Armory EMP...Very Impressive!
Replies: 21
Views: 4370

AWMP wrote:badkarma56 thanks for the pics, I will be carrying my Kimber Ultra CDP II for sometime until my budget allows for the EMP. I like the EMP because it shoots cheaper ammo, but I have always enjoyed the 45acp just because of the larger bullet.
Good deal, I like the .45 ACP for the same reason! However, with the right load (Winchester Ranger-T or Federal HST), the 9mm will do a day's work, plus it's so much cheaper to practice with. :smile:
by badkarma56
Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:34 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Springfield Armory EMP...Very Impressive!
Replies: 21
Views: 4370

AWMP wrote:Have you found a good holster for the EMP?
Hey AWMP,

I'm eventually going to have Andrew Johnson of AKJ Concealco make a custom IWB rig for my EMP. I currently own two of his holsters (for my USP Compact/9mm which is my primary carry piece, and also my USP45), and he does fantastic custom work for a great price (about $80-$90). An added benefit is that you don't have to wait until the rapture to get your holster (he delivers in about 5-6 weeks).

Sample pics of his work:
Image
Image

Check out his website for more details on his holsters: http://www.concealco.com/miva/merchant.mvc

I going to resist the impulse to carry the EMP until I've put a few hundred more rounds through it...I generally like to fire 1,000 rounds through any new weapon before "trusting" it. ;-) Thus far, the EMP has been solid with no malfunctions whatsoever!
by badkarma56
Mon Nov 05, 2007 10:01 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Springfield Armory EMP...Very Impressive!
Replies: 21
Views: 4370

Re: Springfield Armory EMP...Very Impressive!

KBCraig wrote:That is exactly why my next carry gun will be SAO, preferably a 1911. ... One of the common arguments against carrying a single action pistol, is the notion that ND/SD is a bigger risk. Hogwash! So long as proper trigger discipline is observed ("booger hook off the bang switch"), it's not going to go "bang" unexpectedly...
I agree, carrying a well-designed pistol in condition-1 (i.e., cocked and locked) is just as safe as any other carry method. That's partly why I selected a USP Compact for my carry weapon, even though it's a DA/SA weapon, the "Variant 1" USP's all have 1911-style thumb safeties which allow for condition-1 carry. My full-size USP45 is also a "Variant 1" model.

If anything, the fact that 1911's require their integral "grip safeties" to be depressed by the compression of your strong hand around the grip (thus allowing for the trigger to be pulled) makes them an inherently safe "manual of arms" if you ask me.
by badkarma56
Mon Nov 05, 2007 8:28 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Springfield Armory EMP...Very Impressive!
Replies: 21
Views: 4370

jbirds1210 wrote:I just can'f find a place on the gun to put my fingers without slowing the slide down :grin:
Jason
Hey Jason,

Like you, I also have large hands and I generally prefer full-size pistols for the exact same reason. I'm right-handed, and hold any auto-pistol with a high/tight, thumbs-forward, two handed grip. Generally, my support thumb rests on the forward part of the slide, while my strong thumb rests on the rearward portion of the slide/thumb safety (slightly contacting the cocking serrations). That said, I didn't suffer any problems during strings of fire with my new EMP...I could "feel" the slide move against my thumbs as it cycled, but this didn't cause any issues.

Obviously, my grip has to be "tighter," and a tad more "compact" on the EMP than with my USP45, but I still held the weapon just like all my others.

This picture (of Larry Vickers shooting a pre-production HK45) pretty much illustrates my style of grip:
Image
by badkarma56
Mon Nov 05, 2007 1:21 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: Springfield Armory EMP...Very Impressive!
Replies: 21
Views: 4370

Springfield Armory EMP...Very Impressive!

Fellow Shooters,

After a few months of consideration, I recently decided to take the plunge and pick up one of those Springfield EMP 9mm 1911's. I'm a long time shooter, and I own several makes of weapons (H&K, Sig, Beretta), but I had never owned a 1911-style pistol before now. The primary reason that I have avoided 1911's in the past comes down to one word...reliability. Fair or unfair, I've heard/seen/read about various issues with various makes of 1911's...truthfully, the problem seems to be the vast numbers of manufacturers (I can think of 15 companies that make 1911's off the top of my head) with wildly varying ideas of "quality control" for this legendary pistol design. Aesthetically, I've always admired the 1911 design...in fact, even though I had never broken-down and bought one before now, I've always considered a nice 1911 to be the most attractive handgun design of all time.

I don't own a digital camera, so I can't showcase my particular EMP, but here's a picture of one for those who may not be familiar:

Image

I had been looking for an excuse to buy a new pistol for a few months now, and I was tacitly considering a full-sized 1911 just for a change of pace. After looking at a few brands, I decided to go with Springfield for my first 1911, primarily because of their reputation for strong customer service and the lifetime warranty. Long story short, I eventually discovered the existence of the EMP a few months back and fell in love at first sight! The fact that the weapon was chambered in 9mm really appealed to me. I own a USP45, and I like to shoot the weapon, but feeding another .45 these days is a bit pricey...I can still find affordable 9mm ammo on the web. Also, the pistol's compact size seemed perfect for carry purposes. So, after due consideration, I decided that I'd buy one as soon as I found a decent price. Springfield's MSRP on the EMP is $1253...I was willing to go to around$950-$1000 for the pleasure.

I purchased the little pistol last Sunday (28OCT) at the big "funshow" held at Reliant Park. I had been looking for an EMP online for a while with no joy, so when I came across a booth at the show that had one for sale (for $999, no less) I snatched it right up!

Initial Impressions at the range

Well, if my new EMP is any indication of the shootability of a "high quality" 1911, I might have just become a convert to the platform. ;-) I finally got to the range on Saturday to fire the weapon, and let me say this, that little gun is awesome!:grin:

First, let me say something about the trigger. After years of shooting service-grade pistols with standard DA/SA actions, the crisp/clean SA break of a 1911 trigger is heaven on Earth. Springfield says that the EMP is tuned with a 5 pound trigger-pull, that felt about right to me, although I don't own a trigger-pull scale to confirm. Anyhow, that first shot was a real eye-opener...this 1911's trigger easily beats the feel of my P226, 92FS, or USP, it's so much cleaner with a much shorter trigger reset.

As for reliability, my EMP seems to be good-to-go. I brought along 250 rounds of ammo to "break in" the weapon (100 rounds of Remington UMC 115 gr. FMJ, 100 rounds of Federal XML9N1 NATO-spec 124 gr. TMJ, and 50 rounds of Winchester Ranger-T 147 gr. JHP). I started out "hot" with the NATO-spec Federal ammo and the EMP ran perfectly. Others may disagree, but I've always believed in breaking-in my guns with "hot" ammo right at the start. I've done this with all of my other pistols, so I figured that I'd adopt the same approach again. Anyhow, the EMP (with it's 3 in. bull barrel) gobbled the Federal ammo right on up. Next was the UMC, which many consider to be fairly sedate and underpowered. I figured that the tight, new pistol may choke on this ammo, but to my surprise and delight it did not. Thus far, 200 rounds down range with ZERO malfunctions! Now for the moment of truth...hollow points.

Lastly, I tried out 50 rounds of hollow point ammo in the weapon. I picked some Ranger-T for the task since that happens to be my preferred brand of defensive/carry ammo. As I was loading up the mags for the final part of this initial range trip, I thought to myself, "surely this new gun will at least hiccup on hollow points..." Well my friends, despite what you may have heard elsewhere, my EMP didn't have any trouble at all. In fact, my best groups of the day came with the 147 gr. JHP ammo (2-2.5 in., "off hand" at 21 feet). In general, the weapon was very accurate all afternoon long. With the exception of a couple of "flyers," I was able to keep my shots inside of the 9 and 10 rings of a standard B-27 style silhouette target. I didn't fire from a rest on this first trip, but I suspect that the little gun will perform unbelievably from a rest!

In sum, I can't recommend this little pistol enough. If you're on the fence about getting one, and you like the looks of 1911-style guns, I say go for it!

Return to “Springfield Armory EMP...Very Impressive!”