Search found 1 match

by Soccerdad1995
Fri Sep 04, 2020 2:08 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: How liberals think bullets are stopped
Replies: 14
Views: 3765

Re: How liberals think bullets are stopped

Let's put aside the fact that a finger won't stop a bullet. Even if it did, this would still be a stupid idea.

They're going to hire 1,000,000 people who will each go and locate a gun that owned by someone. They will then break into that person's car / house so they can put their finger in the muzzle of the gun. I'm assuming they will then refuse to leave and will go anywhere that gun goes, 24/7. OK, so let's also assume that none of the 1,000,000 people will get arrested for kidnapping, etc., and they also won't get shot. They'll presumably wear Depends so they don't have to leave their "post" ever.

Assuming all of this, they will succeed in disabling less than 1/3 of 1% of the guns in America (at lot less if we include military and LEO).

On the plus side, that's 1 million fewer Democratic votes for the next election (can't exactly vote if you are following someone around 24/7 to keep your finger in their gun). Is there anyway that we can get all 1 million people to be from swing states?

Return to “How liberals think bullets are stopped”