TexasCHLforum.com

Tex1961 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 10:06 am

Soccerdad1995 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 21, 2022 9:51 am

locke_n_load wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 11:23 pm US law shield is of the opinion that a simple gunbuster sign may hold force of law to prohibit unlicensed carry. And based on the penal code verbiage, I may be inclined to agree with them.

Can you elaborate on this?

Here is the link to their CC packet they put together..


https://cdn.brandfolder.io/5Z10RK5F/at/ ... igital.pdf

They are in the business of sowing fear, so I view anything from them as biased. I was more curious about your reference to having read the actual statute language.

locke_n_load wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 11:23 pm US law shield is of the opinion that a simple gunbuster sign may hold force of law to prohibit unlicensed carry. And based on the penal code verbiage, I may be inclined to agree with them.

Can you elaborate on this?

I am not seeing these signs, but I am seeing alot of signs that dispense incorrect legal advice / opinions by stating that "unlicensed carry of a firearm is a felony" aka the old blue TABC signs. I think a lawyer here previously said that posting signs with incorrect legal advice is not a crime (at least if you are not a lawyer), but then again, IANAL, so I really don't know.

It is frustrating nonetheless.