I believe it is vital if we are to restore and maintain trust in policing.JustSomeOldGuy wrote: ↑Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:04 amIt would also have a salutary effect in certain departments by instilling the awareness they would NOT be able to control the investigation.
Search found 5 matches
Return to “TX: San Antonio Road Rage Incident”
- Sat Jun 02, 2018 11:09 am
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: TX: San Antonio Road Rage Incident
- Replies: 31
- Views: 10829
Re: TX: San Antonio Road Rage Incident
- Fri Jun 01, 2018 8:33 pm
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: TX: San Antonio Road Rage Incident
- Replies: 31
- Views: 10829
Re: TX: San Antonio Road Rage Incident
Yeah I oon't know that the Rangers is the answer but agencies investigating themselves doesn't pass the smell test.SewTexas wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 5:04 pm
the only problem with the Rangers is that you're still having LEO's investigating LEO's, so I'm not so sure about the confidence that's instilled.
yes, I'd rather the mayor stay out of it too, but you don't want a judge appointing a panel the judicial system shouldn't be involved at that point yet.
I don't know what the answer is....
- Fri Jun 01, 2018 4:28 pm
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: TX: San Antonio Road Rage Incident
- Replies: 31
- Views: 10829
Re: TX: San Antonio Road Rage Incident
I'd rather the major stay out of it. The Texas Rangers or some similarly independent authority. 98% of cases would probably end about the same as they would have with an internal investigation but it would instill confidence in the process.
- Fri Jun 01, 2018 3:15 pm
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: TX: San Antonio Road Rage Incident
- Replies: 31
- Views: 10829
- Fri Jun 01, 2018 12:44 pm
- Forum: Self-Defense Reports
- Topic: TX: San Antonio Road Rage Incident
- Replies: 31
- Views: 10829
Re: TX: San Antonio Road Rage Incident
That sounds more like a revenge shoot than a defensive shoot.ElGallo wrote: ↑Fri Jun 01, 2018 9:54 am This is my theory.
Offduty officer pulled into parking lot and was followed by civilian. I'm assuming he thought this place would have cameras or he was indeed going for some eye candy. Officer decided to talk to civilian and maybe smooth things over, explain how his actions are not appropriate, i.e. deescalate the situation but also prevent civilian from doing this to others in the future.
Officer gets out of vehicle, walks around the front of his car, civilian gets out of his car and immediately shoots at the officer. Maybe he felt threatened and that's why he shot. The officer goes back to his car to retrieve his weapon, civilian is getting into his car, officer shoots the civilian through the passenger side window of his car, hits the civilian (maybe in the back hence why there are reports he might be paralyzed) and graces the civilian's passenger.
I hope there is a follow up to this.