The assault occurred within the secure perimeter, so it met the elements of the act.baldeagle wrote:How do you get away with it? The law specifically states the offense must occur in jail.Glockedandlocked wrote:I have written this charge for spitting using PC22.11, basically boils down to assault by contact - bodily fluids. The result was 6 year sentence to be ran stacked on top of the parole violation that caused the return to custody.
There are other charges that can be filed on the street level for officers, for citizens a simple assault charge would be appropriate.
It is considered felony level for us because it was done based on our position and often as retaliation for official acts.
It should not be limited to HIV positives, there are other things that people carry that are more immediately life threatening/debilitating than HIV.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Police Group Upset Over DPS Director's "Spit" Comment”
- Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:53 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Police Group Upset Over DPS Director's "Spit" Comment
- Replies: 44
- Views: 7844
Re: Police Group Upset Over DPS Director's "Spit" Comment
- Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:52 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Police Group Upset Over DPS Director's "Spit" Comment
- Replies: 44
- Views: 7844
Re: Police Group Upset Over DPS Director's "Spit" Comment
They are tested but because of HIPAA laws we are not able to be informed of their medical status unless the inmate tells us themselves.nightmare69 wrote:I know the get a TB test before going to TDC. I know TDC does its own medical tests upon intake.WildBill wrote:Do you know if sentenced prisoners are given routine medical checks for HIV, hepatitis,TB etc. before being put into the general prison population?Glockedandlocked wrote:I have written this charge for spitting using PC22.11, basically boils down to assault by contact - bodily fluids. The result was 6 year sentence to be ran stacked on top of the parole violation that caused the return to custody.
There are other charges that can be filed on the street level for officers, for citizens a simple assault charge would be appropriate.
It is considered felony level for us because it was done based on our position and often as retaliation for official acts.
It should not be limited to HIV positives, there are other things that people carry that are more immediately life threatening/debilitating than HIV.
- Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:49 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Police Group Upset Over DPS Director's "Spit" Comment
- Replies: 44
- Views: 7844
Re: Police Group Upset Over DPS Director's "Spit" Comment
I am looking for a specific charge that would be appropriate for the citizen assaulted by spit or other fluids, will post if I come up with something that would stick.mojo84 wrote:nightmare69 wrote:orbaldeagle wrote:How do you get away with it? The law specifically states the offense must occur in jail.Glockedandlocked wrote:I have written this charge for spitting using PC22.11, basically boils down to assault by contact - bodily fluids. The result was 6 year sentence to be ran stacked on top of the parole violation that caused the return to custody.
There are other charges that can be filed on the street level for officers, for citizens a simple assault charge would be appropriate.
It is considered felony level for us because it was done based on our position and often as retaliation for official acts.
It should not be limited to HIV positives, there are other things that people carry that are more immediately life threatening/debilitating than HIV.
(2) causes another person the actor knows to be a public servant to contact the blood, seminal fluid, vaginal fluid, saliva, urine, or feces of the actor, any other person, or an animal while the public servant is lawfully discharging an official duty or in retaliation or on account of an exercise of the public servant's official power or performance of an official duty.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.
I may be wrong but I think the conversation has moved on to someone spitting on a noncop and being charged for assault.
- Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:42 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Police Group Upset Over DPS Director's "Spit" Comment
- Replies: 44
- Views: 7844
Re: Police Group Upset Over DPS Director's "Spit" Comment
I have written this charge for spitting using PC22.11, basically boils down to assault by contact - bodily fluids. The result was 6 year sentence to be ran stacked on top of the parole violation that caused the return to custody.
There are other charges that can be filed on the street level for officers, for citizens a simple assault charge would be appropriate.
It is considered felony level for us because it was done based on our position and often as retaliation for official acts.
It should not be limited to HIV positives, there are other things that people carry that are more immediately life threatening/debilitating than HIV.
There are other charges that can be filed on the street level for officers, for citizens a simple assault charge would be appropriate.
It is considered felony level for us because it was done based on our position and often as retaliation for official acts.
It should not be limited to HIV positives, there are other things that people carry that are more immediately life threatening/debilitating than HIV.