TexasCHLforum.com

Beiruty wrote:

Beiruty wrote:Would not fly as the business is not liable for 3rd parties destructive acts.

You can sue if there is not enough security measures and if they deny you the right for self defense. It is a theory and I am not sure why such case is not in courts yet.

If we were to pursue this then at least we would put the anti-gunners on the defensive; make them spend their time and money defending instead of constantly attacking, just a thought.

I like this idea!

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -shooting/