I was responding to C-dub's post. It is the OP's choice whether to pursue an assault charge, which he decided not to do. I agree with the way he is handling the incident.Soccerdad1995 wrote:And I believe there is a clear consensus that this was very wrong and very stupid on the part of the LEO. As to whether the actions may possibly have been criminal, I think that may be a moot point given that the OP does not appear interested in filing a criminal complaint over this incident.WildBill wrote:The off-duty LEO/security guard grabbed the pistol from the OP's holster.C-dub wrote:I'm still curious about the way he disarmed the OP. Unless I missed it, I don't think anyone has offered up a yay or nay on this. If I did miss it, I do apologize.C-dub wrote:My question wasn't about whether he was right or wrong since it is clear that he was wrong. I'm curious about his method of disarmament. Were he not a LEO what he did would clearly be an assault. It would be if someone attempted to disarm a LEO like that and likely result in their death. My question is, due to his ignorance, is he given a free pass on the "assault" because of being a LEO? And at what point does that free pass no longer apply?
If / when this happens to someone other than the OP, the result might be much worse for all involved. I believe that is why there is such a strong call for a substantive response from the Sheriff.

P.S. I think that it would be a stretch that the DA would file assault charges.