Good observation. Your training is showing.nightmare69 wrote:I was told when I went through TABC training that their definition of premise differs from TPC 46.035. Makes sense cause depending what section you are in words can have multiple definitions. Perfect example is the definition of a child, there are 3 definitions for age defines a child that I know of.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “should we report a place to TABC?”
- Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:08 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: should we report a place to TABC?
- Replies: 46
- Views: 7329
Re: should we report a place to TABC?
- Sun Mar 30, 2014 11:45 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: should we report a place to TABC?
- Replies: 46
- Views: 7329
Re: should we report a place to TABC?
Steve - Thanks for your perspective. It's nice to see you posting again.srothstein wrote:I agree with your understanding of the law and see where we disagree. You are arguing the actual law as it is written. I am pointing out what the courts might do if the case was brought to them.
There is a legal philosophy known as realism that says the law is not really the law until the courts have ruled on what it really means. I do not subscribe to that theory in particular but recognize that many judges do and will act in ways that my understanding of the written law says are wrong.
I ran across this article written by Jabez Fox. It is titled "Law and Logic" and was published in the Harvard Law Review in 1899.
Maybe a bit off topic, but still relevant to this discussion.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1322630" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Wed Mar 26, 2014 7:31 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: should we report a place to TABC?
- Replies: 46
- Views: 7329
Re: should we report a place to TABC?
Go ahead and report them. It is important that events are properly posted.corbmonster wrote:Sherwood Forrest in McDade has 51% signs by the entrance. 1) They are expired. 2) They are black, not red. 3) Sherwood forest is not a building at all, but open grounds (I've been told that 51% only applies to a (1) building, not an open area). 4) If you look up the license on TABC it doesn't say sherwood forest is the owner. It says the owner is "RENAISSANCE BEVERAGE COMPANY LLC". If you Google who that is, it is a beverage import / export llc. based out of Florida, and does not have a TX office according to the web site. Something does not add up here. I've looked all over the Sherwood Forrest web site and don't see any reference to ren fair bev co. So, should they be reported?
TABC Liscense: BG742408
TABC Liscence search page: http://www.tabc.state.tx.us/PublicInquiry/Status.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ren. bev. co. website: http://renaissancebeverage.com/1.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sherwood forest website: http://www.sherwoodforestfaire.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;