It is possible that the cotton-candy thief knew about it and thought he could get away without paying. I am curious why no charges have been filed.sjfcontrol wrote:Nothing in that article about the cotton-candy vendor being a sex offender, but it did mention that the confrontation started when he yelled at the teen when the teen took some cotton-candy without paying.Jumping Frog wrote:Another example where a single punch to the head caused serious bodily injury
Cotton candy vendor in critical condition, after being punched by teen
I am not letting anyone punch me. If I have to shoot them first, so be it.
As far as the cotton candy vendor goes, the teenager's defense may be "he needed punching". The old guy is a convicted sex offender. All that said, I just wanted to illustrate a case where unarmed was still deadly force.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Unarmed was still deadly force.”
- Thu Jul 05, 2012 4:38 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Unarmed was still deadly force.
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1529