TexasCHLforum.com

Excaliber wrote:Nope.

Just honest feedback, which I sincerely appreciate.

sjfcontrol wrote:Seems to me that implementing a new rule to require documentation of stated "facts" would constitute "growth" of the rule base. This is the logic behind the expansion of tax regulations, and government growth in general.

Some rules are necessary, and I believe already in place. The internet in general is a place where there are few "rules", and I like it that way. I agree with DragonFighter that statements can be challenged if someone disagrees with them. I think that's all that is necessary. More rules, more laws, more regulation, who needs it? At this rate, someday they'll even have 1500 page laws, and even want to prevent talking on cell phones while driving... oh, wait...