This is a very old tactic. It was one of the "rational" for banning assault rifles and high capacity magazines - because you don't need them for hunting.Jalapeno Prepper wrote:Actually, I think it means a lot. It shows they're either stupid and don't understand the second amendment or they think we're stupid enough to fall for their bait and switch. The only hunting protected by the second amendment is hunting redcoats. Metaphorically speaking of course.alvins wrote:my problem with him he is like oh i support 2nd ammendment because im a hunter.well i dont hunt so what does that make me?
i know some hunters that dont think you need a handgun for anything.For me talking about hunting has nothing to do with anything.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Mitt Romney is addressing the National Rifle Association”
- Sat Apr 14, 2012 7:06 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Mitt Romney is addressing the National Rifle Association
- Replies: 46
- Views: 5612