Yes, I meant "a third person."fishfree wrote:"a third party"... no, a person.
Thanks for correcting me.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Sometimes it's best to stay uninvolved”
- Tue Mar 20, 2012 10:34 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Sometimes it's best to stay uninvolved
- Replies: 43
- Views: 7106
Re: Sometimes it's best to stay uninvolved
Thanks for correcting me.
- Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:36 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Sometimes it's best to stay uninvolved
- Replies: 43
- Views: 7106
Re: Sometimes it's best to stay uninvolved
I have no duty or obligation to put my life in danger for a third party. I may choose to do so, but it is not a responsibility to do so.fishfree wrote:No. They do not. You may choose otherwise.WildBill wrote:Your responsibilities end when you put yourself in danger for a stranger.fishfree wrote:Do not rights also carry responsibilities?
- Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:36 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Sometimes it's best to stay uninvolved
- Replies: 43
- Views: 7106
Re: Sometimes it's best to stay uninvolved
Your responsibilities end when you put yourself in danger for a stranger.fishfree wrote:Do not rights also carry responsibilities?
- Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:06 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Sometimes it's best to stay uninvolved
- Replies: 43
- Views: 7106
Re: Sometimes it's best to stay uninvolved
Gray hoodies also look suspicious to me.The Annoyed Man wrote:What the heck is the dealio with black hoodies? You'd think by now that pretty much everybody is suspiscious of people skulking around in black hoodies. You'd think people would react to a black hoodie just like bluejays when a crow shows up.philip964 wrote:Child whose mother was in the hospital said the man was wearing a black hoodie.
