TexasCHLforum.com

BLG wrote:

Justin Franklin wrote:

WildBill wrote:

jtran987 wrote:im just saying there are too many people who have a chl who dont deserve one ...

I'm guessing these people would disagree.

George Washington, George Read, Gunning Bedford, Jr., John Dickinson, Richard Bassett, Jacob Broom, James McHenry, Daniel of St. Thomas Jenifer, Daniel Carroll, John Blair, James Madison, Jr., William Blount, Richard Dobbs Spaight, Hugh Williamson, John Rutledge, Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, Charles Pinckney, Pierce Butler, William Few, Abraham Baldwin, John Langdon, Nicholas Gilman, Nathaniel Gorham, Rufus King, William Samuel Johnson, Roger Sherman, Alexander Hamilton, William Livingston, David Brearley, William Paterson, Jonathan Dayton, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Mifflin, Robert Morris, George Clymer, Thomas FitzSimons, Jared Ingersoll, James Wilson, Gouverneur Morris

Sorry folks, I came to this thread from a newr one and got called away,so I forgot which I was reading.
but it sounded good, soI think I'll leave it



Add my name to the list.

Everyone, including convicted felons(having served their sentence) has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This requires the right to defend said life. In turn, that requires the right to prepare an effective defense. Whether and how well one prepares is up to him, not me, or the state.

Might this present some danger from the inexperienced or ignorant? Yes. Could that possibly be more dangerous than a government that will tell me what I can and can't do? Or what I can and can't have? I don't think so. Not by several orders of magnitude.

jtran987 wrote:im just saying there are too many people who have a chl who dont deserve one ...