I can't find any legal definition, but one of Webster's definition is "to sell or distribute something as a business." So that is how I interpret it. It still doesn't make much sense that a dealer could possess a switchblade if he couldn't sell it to anyone, but another dealer. He could sell it to a LEO, but then it wouldn't be an antique or curio. I still can't fathom the intent of this defense. Maybe for displays of antiques at museums?seamusTX wrote:This is the law:I don't know what "dealing with" is supposed to mean. Is everyone who buys or sells a piece a dealer? If not, who can a dealer deal with? - Jim(d) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section that the actor's conduct:
(1) was incidental to dealing with a switchblade knife, springblade knife, or short-barrel firearm solely as an antique or curio;
Search found 2 matches
- Tue Jun 10, 2008 3:57 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Saps, et al.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2202
Re: Saps, et al.
- Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:08 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Saps, et al.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2202
Re: Saps, et al.
Check out this site http://dao-web.dao.hctx.net/ie/TEXAS%20 ... 20LAWS.pdf