Search found 19 matches

by parabelum
Tue Nov 08, 2016 5:48 am
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

That's per dnc hacks themselves. Too early to dig, but plenty credible videos and links are out there for those who doubt.

Which is even more so a reason to go and vote Trump/Pence.
by parabelum
Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:35 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

:totap:
by parabelum
Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:53 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

Charles L. Cotton wrote:I have to admit that I haven't been following this thread and I now regret it. I'm shocked at some of the personal attacks against members who say they are voting for Hillary. That's a direct violation of our rules. We are not an echo chamber as are some forums.

Stop now.
Chas.
Charles,

Speaking strictly for myself here, some remarks I made here which might have been on personal side came as result of what I perceived to be a deliberate provocation by some to bash Trump without any substantive argument to support the opposing viewpoint.

In my opinion, Trump bashing was done solely to provoke and not to engage in a mature dialog, as several members here have tried to demonstrate ad nauseum why Trump is a better choice etc. in this and in other threads, as flawed as he may be.

It is always the same one or two folks who start the bash train, aim to provoke in a passive aggressive manner the forum majority, then when the fire is lit they stand back, arms crossed, hat tilted slightly and with the straw hanging from their mouth they cry foul how they are appalled as to how they are treated.

I offer a gentlemans apology, but, can we not at least draw a line in sand with Trump bashing until at least November 9'th?

Once we get him elected, we will hold his feet to fire big time, but that despicable treasonous lying witch must not get into WH.
by parabelum
Sat Oct 22, 2016 6:06 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

Dancing bananas. That about summarizes this election.
by parabelum
Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:07 am
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

mojo84 wrote:While we are arguing and fighting among ourselves, the progressives are united and working toward getting their candidate elected. There's no chance a republican will win the white house with the horsepower and united front the progressives have.

Check this out. Notice some of the names mentioned and then realize this one organization has over a 100 billionaires and multi-millionaires that are members of Soros organization, Democracy Alliance. So much for the republican party being the party of the rich. Reading the entire article will give you a better idea of who's involved and how powerful they are in politics.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2010

Summary: Stephen M. Silberstein, a member of George Soros’s far-left Democracy Alliance, sheds light on the extent of Soros’s socialist agenda for America. Silberstein’s foundation backs a panoply of leftist groups that fight for higher taxes on the rich, wealth redistribution schemes, single-payer socialized medicine, burdensome regulation of energy markets, judicial activism designed to advance a radically egalitarian agenda, and the replacement of the linchpin of federalism, the Electoral College, with a national popular vote. George Soros’s secretive donor consortium, the Democracy Alliance, has been making news lately in the wake of a new plan set forth at its four-day conference entitled “A New Progressive Era?” which took place in Chicago at the end of April 2014. According to the Washington Post, “The plan, being crafted in private by a group of about 100 donors that includes billionaire hedge fund manager George Soros and San Francisco venture capitalist Rob McKay, seeks to give Democrats a stronger hand in the redrawing of district lines for state legislatures and the U.S. House.” More specifically, the newspaper reports that “keeping Democratic control of the Senate” was of paramount concern to the donors. “There’s a lot of anxiety about the midterms,” admitted McKay, the outgoing chairman, “who said substantial investment this year will go to local and state minimum-wage campaigns that can help drive turnout for federal races.” The new plan would shift significant resources away from the Alliance’s typical focus on donating to left-wing media outlets and think tanks, such as Media Matters for America and the John Podesta-founded Center for American Progress. Assuming the reported shift occurs, the Alliance will try to engage in ground-level political campaigning by in effect acting as a bundling super PAC—an über super PAC—in order to prevent the expected GOP takeover of the Senate.
Interpol should arrest that demon Soros. He is that money changer in the Temple Jesus warned us about.
by parabelum
Tue Oct 18, 2016 7:04 am
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

In the meantime, we are, in my opinion, very near WWIII.

And, that war monger witch will make it worse.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1999495/v ... ble-fleet/
by parabelum
Tue Oct 18, 2016 5:25 am
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

At this point, this topic has gone from Trump vs. Clinton poll, to bash/smear Trump relentlessly.

:blowup
by parabelum
Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:11 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

Mojo,Soccerdad,TreyHouston and others:

Great job on doing research and trying to demonstrate what's going on here.

Those who still beat the same drum and continue to smear Trump right now are either heavily medicated, are receiving some kind of kickback from the fascist machine, are playing for the other side, or all of the above.


By definition, you cannot reason with unreasonable people.

:deadhorse:
by parabelum
Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:27 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

v7a wrote:
parabelum wrote:These are the moles who have been sitting here as poseurs pretending to be "one of us".
I'd be curious to hear how my contributions to the campus carry lawsuit thread fit into your mole theory. Presumably you're already familiar with those contributions from your in-depth research of moles on this forum. :smilelol5:
I appreciate how you once were :tiphat: , however, what I was referring to the overall disposition towards the only viable candidate that we have right now.

Can't we just agree that it might be better to pounce on Trump on certain issues in due time and not few weeks until the general election?
by parabelum
Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:10 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

Soccerdad1995 wrote:
v7a wrote:Right, so you were extrapoliting your own personal experience to the majority of the male population. However, your personal experience is no more representative than mine (which is that men in locker rooms generally do not boast about sexually assaulting women by touching their genitals without consent). Never mind that locker room talk isn't even the applicable standard here. Trump made these comments to a TV host, not in a locker room setting.
Yes. I was basing my perception of the world in part on my own personal experiences. Just like you are doing. And I will point out that you have offered zero basis for your claim that our personal experiences are equally representative of the male population in the U.S. Regardless, neither of us has any "scientific studies" that show what men (or women) talk about when they are having private conversations. But I'm assuming that we have been involved in plenty of private conversations with others of the same sex, so that is what we have to go on. My delicate ears were not offended by Trump's comments. If yours were, then I'm sorry you had to endure that abuse. And it doesn't really matter where the private conversation occurs. "Locker room banter" is a euphemism for a type of talk, not meant to be taken literally as talk that happened in a locker room. I would have assumed that someone with a personal experience that was as broadly representative of the entire male population would be more familiar with that term.
Hillary's crimes and behavior do not excuse Trump's and vice versa.
Agreed. She should be held to task for her attacks on rape victims of her husband and for enabling his behavior regardless of anything that Trump may or may not have done. It is just very ironic when she then holds herself out as a champion for women (the one ad I saw of hers where she did anything other than attack Trump).
Of course it's being used to attack Trump. Which is why it was the height of stupidity for Trump to make Bill's sexual misconduct and alleged sexual assaults the closing theme of his campaign when he had his own skeletons in the closet. Professional campaigns do opposition research on their own candidate so they can be prepared for attacks. Trump however is a clown candidate so naturally he refused to let his campaign do opposition research on himself
Why do all of you people (Hillary supporters) insist on name calling and vitriol? "Clown candidate"? Really? And I suppose you still think that Trump's campaign is the one that is based on hate?

Go vote for Hillary and enjoy your life as a subject. I'm done with this thread.
Soccerdad,

These are the moles who have been sitting here as poseurs pretending to be "one of us".

I have ZERO patience at this point for these smears. Just look at the quantity of smear posts against Trump by the same few people.

They are the dividers.
by parabelum
Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:07 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

ScottDLS wrote:And why didn't these allegations against Trump appear until AFTER the Republican primary? Because the Democrats WANTED to run against Trump...since even Jeb! could have beaten HITLERY. :shock:
Because Billy boy, Jeb!'s little cousin, along with the whole ruling class families, Bush and Clinton in particular, would have treated Trump much differently had he not taken Jeb!'s turn.


For what it's worth, these two families would have, in my opinion, destroyed Ted Cruz, Rubio or whoever else would have gotten in their way.


But you see, there are millions of us who know their game and we will not forget.


Traitors. Dirty rotten traitors they are all, for what they've done to this Nation.

And now, they salivate over themselves how successful they are at infiltrating conservative channels, just as they were able to get few of their moles in here.
by parabelum
Mon Oct 17, 2016 12:24 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

I have to admit, makes me sick to see pro 2A folks come to a forum devoted to Second Amendment, go into a topic of Trump vs. Clinton poll, and then proceed to drudge up leftist smears against literary the only viable pro 2A candidate that's coming up for a vote in just few short weeks.

Really grinds my gears, the cynicism and non stop Trump bashing, you know...
by parabelum
Mon Oct 17, 2016 12:05 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

v7a wrote:
Soccerdad1995 wrote:Yet Trump uses crude language in what he thinks is a private discussion with a guy and all the republicans scatter?
Uh, he didn't merely use crude language. He described himself committing actions that are legally considered sexual assault. Numerous women have since stepped forward and accused him of doing exactly what he described himself doing.
Here we go with holier than thou attitude. Sure, you'd never ever say something or do anything in private that would either offend someone or be considered crude, or, dare I say, even criminal. :roll:
by parabelum
Mon Oct 17, 2016 12:02 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

v7a wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:I see what's going on. In this poll you have only two choices, Trump or Clinton. And since if you don't vote for Trump you're helping Clinton win...so you should check Clinton,if your being honest.

While you're being honest... If you voted for Trump in the Republican primary then you definitely should check Clinton in the poll, because YOU voted for HER by electing the absolute worst of the 17, and the only one that Clinton wanted to run against.
Bingo.

Whatever happened to the Trump supporters who claimed he would dominate Clinton in the general election because he's a media genius? :smilelol5:
You guys are hilarious, with your humor and cynicism. Way too high brow for me.
by parabelum
Sat Oct 15, 2016 6:05 am
Forum: Federal
Topic: Trump or Clinton--our own poll
Replies: 221
Views: 59104

Re: Trump or Clinton--our own poll

infoman wrote:Wow, I've been a member of this forum for many years & probably know as much or more about gun laws & General CHL/LTC than most on this forum yet I get called a "troll" & bashed for saying I'm voting a certain way. In regards to gun control, I know that neither candidate will ban owning guns, neither will "do away" with the 2nd amendment & there will most definitely be a TEXAS LTC 4 years from now. I'm also not for constitutional carry. I'm glad Texas has eligibility requirements for those wanting LTC's. I'm glad that we do thorough background checks & I'm proud to have & know others who have an LTC knowing they are law abiding citizens. Again, no one will ban the owning/carrying of handguns in Texas- no way no how. It's a state thing, the Texas legislature would have to make that call.
I wouldn't have called you a troll were in not for your usual (this isn't the first time you've done this) one liner "I support Hillary ...". While some on here provide extensive reasons (like mojo did just now) why that witch should never come near WH, again, you just throw a one liner supporting the witch without even attempting to provide clear and rational reason why. It comes across to me as you are trying to stir the pot with majority of folks on here that you know detest the witch. It's that age old divide and conquer tactic.

You do understand that some of us detest that creature in WH and this witch to a point indescribable, for what that gang has done to this Country.

Moreover, if you are truly not a mole but a genuine 2A supporter, then how do you reconcile the stance that witch has towards NRA and gun owners in general? How do you defend her high crimes and misdemeanors? What's in it for you?

Return to “Trump or Clinton--our own poll”