TexasCHLforum.com

What’s even more disturbing is that the acting Director was supposedly unaware (according to his testimony) that some of his top agents were political hacks. Now, supposedly the one in particular (name slips my mind now) is under disciplinary review, but…

The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 2:15 pm

Rafe wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 11:48 am This video from Warrior Poet Society just popped up on my YouTube recommendations so I thought I would, you know, share...

Mike Glover objects as well. The Security Branch of the DNC (AKA “FBI”) document directly labeled his group by name, American Contingency, as militia violent extremists. This is of course exactly the opposite of what they actually are.

Any grounds for defamation suit? Maybe not now given this rotten political climate, but down the road?
No due process (I know nobody got convicted per se, but there are damages done to peoples lives being on that list….)

Chemist45 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:04 pm No problem everybody. The head of the FBI just told senator Cruz that he was unaware of this document.

Wait, does that make it better or worse?

I actually believe him. In terms of your question, worse.
Think about how much of a waste of resources (FBI is already strained as it is according to the Director) this is. So….according to that hack definition of domestic terrorist, FBI just narrowed it down to a mere ~15+ million (guess) people who either wear or have the merch or are outspoken about it. Wouldn’t be surprised if some are Agents as well.

So the actual text from the US Constitution made the list, but BLM, Antifa, groups that burned down city blocks, killed police officers etc. are not? Cool.
I also don’t see any mention of the crowd that threatens US Supreme Court Justices on there either, no pro-Abortion groups…

Political. Purely political, and that is a slap in the face of good man and woman who serve in the FBI.