TexasCHLforum.com

anygunanywhere wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:24 pm

I expect a SCOTUS decision on this.

warnmar10 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 9:05 pm

RicoTX wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 8:15 pmWell if I am the one vote Trump loses by, I have no issue with that. If some people think that makes me an idiot, that's okay too. I doubt I will be solely responsible for the downfall of the GOP, that ship sailed years ago, and im as guilty as anyone else for voting for the "less bad" party in the past. No more. I will vote for the person that I think is best suited for the position considering my values, regardless of party affiliation.

Not to beleaguer the issue but do I understand you correctly: Because of the bump stock ban, no matter any other factor, you are compelled on principle to prefer ANY candidate over Trump, including any likely progressive gun grabber?

Soccerdad1995 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:31 pm

canvasbck wrote: ↑Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:21 pm So, overnight many people I know became felons by doing absolutely nothing.

And our current President has just earned the honor of ordering the forfeiture of more guns than any President in the history of our nation. I did vote for him, and I might do so again, and I'm sure Hillary would have done the same, but facts are facts.

AndyC wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 4:48 pm

"Olson even cited the lack of FBI and ATF statements, studies or reports to demonstrate that there is no conclusive evidence that a bump stock was actually used by the Las Vegas shooter.

This was something of a “mic drop” moment, because when given the chance to respond, the government’s lawyer could not — in fact, he refused to — counter Olson’s statement on this point."

https://gunowners.org/alert3719/?fbclid ... Ioz29vhyXQ