TexasCHLforum.com

K.Mooneyham wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 10:57 am

montgomery wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:41 am

Gator Guy wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 9:30 am Unless somebody doesn't comply with NFA already, I'm skeptical they will start, no matter what other firearms fall under that unconstitutional un-law.

Non-compliance is a cowardly act in the absence of performing a patriot act.

Can someone explain to me what those two statements are supposed to mean in this context? I seriously do not get it.

I agree with gator guy.
Basically I think gator guy means if you already comply with the rules, chances are you will comply in the future regardless of the rules. In other words, you haven't fought back yet regarding 2a restrictions, why would anyone believe differently in the future?

I think what Montgomery is saying is that most people won't put their money (and freedom/life) where their mouth is... basically.

My interpretation.... apologies to both if I missed the mark.