It was just a question inspired by the thread. Everything else reads to me like bait for a good ol internet argument.mojo84 wrote:They way it was floated out there in this particular thread sure gave the impression you two were trying to raise the question the triggers had something to do with it.gigag04 wrote:I asked one question about the triggers, some folks answered, and all of sudden people assume we are making excuses shooting innocents.
I used to look forward to meeting forum members whether buying or selling guns and gear, grabbing lunch, or sitting in a booth at a gun show. I'm not so certain I'd be interested in that anymore.
For people that always want to make their decisions on facts, what factual evidence prompted the concern about the triggers? Did the official report from the shooting investigation indicate the triggers may have contributed to the innocent bystanders being shot? I'm just curious what even brought the triggers to mind and why was it asked in this thread if it wasn't to allude to the fact that New York cops' heavy triggers had something to do with it.
I'm just trying to understand the logic and why there appears to be such a double standard.
No thanks.
