1903....this has got be a joke?Rabbi wrote:(W.D.Ky. 1903)
It was a good convo to get me thinking but....I think it has run its course on this one.
vote: lock
Search found 3 matches
- Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:25 am
- Forum: Instructors' Corner
- Topic: Pass/Fail
- Replies: 47
- Views: 16045
Re: What in THe WIde World of Sports
It was a good convo to get me thinking but....I think it has run its course on this one.
vote: lock
- Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:38 pm
- Forum: Instructors' Corner
- Topic: Pass/Fail
- Replies: 47
- Views: 16045
Re: What in THe WIde World of Sports
Post offices again...Rabbi wrote:In some cases, (but not all) this would include places such as Post offices, Railroad right of ways, federal public works projects. Federal Lands, Military bases, Federal Dams and so on.
If there is a CHL shooting in a post office, military base or something like that....you have more problems than how they qualified. Why are they carrying there?
-nick
- Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:01 am
- Forum: Instructors' Corner
- Topic: Pass/Fail
- Replies: 47
- Views: 16045
I'll side with the "this is a non-issue crowd."
Here's why, FWIW....:
1. txinvestigator is the head instructor at a large training center in the metroplex. He's a former LEO, and works with LEOs daily. In my mind, He knows more than I do, and thus...I believe him when he says it is not a real concern.
2. Chaz is an attorney and follows SD issues routinely, as well as teaching on legal ramifications of such encounters. He, again, knows much more than I do on this topic, and thus, I believe him when he says it is not a big deal.
As far as this discussion, I consider these two gentlemen to be much more "in the know" on this subject than the rest of us. I don't want to get into a qualifications debate...I'm merely sharing why I trust the stance of these two.
To add some comic relief...I reflect back to an old school post on here about gmail, some of us just have our tin-foil hats on too tight
Here's why, FWIW....:
1. txinvestigator is the head instructor at a large training center in the metroplex. He's a former LEO, and works with LEOs daily. In my mind, He knows more than I do, and thus...I believe him when he says it is not a real concern.
2. Chaz is an attorney and follows SD issues routinely, as well as teaching on legal ramifications of such encounters. He, again, knows much more than I do on this topic, and thus, I believe him when he says it is not a big deal.
As far as this discussion, I consider these two gentlemen to be much more "in the know" on this subject than the rest of us. I don't want to get into a qualifications debate...I'm merely sharing why I trust the stance of these two.
To add some comic relief...I reflect back to an old school post on here about gmail, some of us just have our tin-foil hats on too tight