chuckybrown wrote:.....we have free speech, but "we shouldn't yell FIRE in a movie theater" either.The Annoyed Man wrote:I believe that the 2nd Amendment right is ought to be unlimited. Balanced against that, I believe that some portion of the time, its full expression isn't wise. That is why I am glad that OC passed, but also why I won't be doing it myself most of the time.
I feel the same way about free speech too.
TAM, you nailed the answer for me. Thank you.
Happy new year!!
But to some, this may seem like political correctness. It is not PC, it's common sense and good judgment.If you mean people in general, I take offense. If you mean politicians, I think some are partial supporters.So, if one agrees with CC, but not OC....is it possible to be a partial 2A supporter?
In other words....can someone support 2A rights....but only to a certain extent...i.e. not exercising 2A rights that might make others "uncomfortable"?
I'm curious, because I think you're either all in, or you're not.
No flames wanted, just honest discourse.
Happy 2016!
Chuckybrown
Just because I most likely will never OC does not mean I am not a full 2A supporter. How can I CC 24/7 and not be a full supporter? Just because I see totally no need for me to OC at wally world, HEB, whataburger or anywhere else, does not mean I do not support OC or 2A. OC is great with a large dose of common sense and good judgment (which OCT has none). OC has caused us to lose more CC locations. The right to OC has infringed on the right to CC. This is not because of OCT, they just expedited the OC info to businesses. If not for OCT, starting today businesses would be freaking out every time they see someone OCing. Then they would have gradually been informed if 30.06/07. OCT just sped the process along.
On a personal note, I am so sick of reading about OC. Charles may need to rename this forum to TexasOCforum.
I'm done ranting.
I hope everyone has a very Happy New Year!!