Search found 2 matches

by Pariah3j
Wed Mar 16, 2016 1:38 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
Replies: 36
Views: 7730

Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland

Bitter Clinger wrote:
Redneck_Buddha wrote:
Pariah3j wrote:I'm hoping this election cycle has taught the 'establishment' republicans a thing or 2 and that they will stick to their guns and not even allow the POTUS nomination a hearing, much less confirm any 'moderates' that he puts up.
Oh...not even. They are doubling down in fact by trying to steal the nomination from Trump and install a Ryan/Kasich ticket. And I am most decidedly NOT a Trump voter, I just hate subversion of the will of the voters.
It's come down to the last two people the establishment wanted vying for candidacy. It's a beautiful thing. :cheers2:
:iagree:

Some talking heads have suggested Ryan/Kasich - but others have said they plan to allow the process work, and the likelyhood of someone other then the 2 frontrunners being a valid or accepted choice would be a fools errand. I wonder if in the end that Cruz will get their backing because there has been alot of 'guess we'll have to eat crow' type comments about Cruz from people like Gramnesty and others of his ilk.
by Pariah3j
Wed Mar 16, 2016 9:57 am
Forum: Federal
Topic: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
Replies: 36
Views: 7730

Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland

I'm hoping this election cycle has taught the 'establishment' republicans a thing or 2 and that they will stick to their guns and not even allow the POTUS nomination a hearing, much less confirm any 'moderates' that he puts up.

Return to “Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland”