Plus you might need doubles of those guns, just in case your SO needs one to use, or in case one is held as evidence, or in case one is out for repair/maintenance, etc.Soccerdad1995 wrote:The author is leaving out the car carry, 3 hunting rifle (for various types of game), BUG, and a competition gun. Also, "concealed carry" will likely equate to at least 3 different guns depending on whether one is wearing light, medium, or heavy clothing. That gets me to 12 as a minimum acceptable number of guns, per person. The poor fellow with only 17 guns is insufficiently armed, IMHO, unless he lives alone.Topbuilder wrote:"Is it because the gun-owner needs 17 guns, or because he likes buying guns? Because once you've got your range pistol, your concealed carry, your shotgun for home defense, and your .22 for plinking, I rather suspect you've moved beyond "need" and started to wander into "want" territory."
http://www.fool.com/investing/2017/01/0 ... un-ow.aspx
I'm pretty sure the author does not know the difference between need and want.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Are you a "Super Owner"?”
- Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:58 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Are you a "Super Owner"?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 5677
