It appears that they believe that anything written before "The Communist Manifesto" no longer should apply. They disavow Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, the US Constitution, as well as the Holy Bible. They recognize the manifesto, The Origin of Species, and 1984. Oh and they make an exception for the Qu'ran, because they'll kill you.rotor wrote:Since the 2nd amendment is to allow us to protect ourselves from government (it's not for stocking the freezer) why do the democrats want to disarm us?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Hillary on Heller (from the 3rd Debate)”
- Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:35 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Hillary on Heller (from the 3rd Debate)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1697
Re: Hillary on Heller (from the 3rd Debate)
- Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:45 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Hillary on Heller (from the 3rd Debate)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1697
Re: Hillary on Heller (from the 3rd Debate)
copied and pasted my comment from the Trump or Clinton Thread.
I can't believe that she can even say the words "right to bear arms". She talks about the years that she spent in Arkansas and says that she understands the value of gun ownership, then she talks about Heller and DC and about how the Supreme Court is wrong about the 2nd Amendment and how she wants to see more limitations on safe storage, etc (which probably means having unloaded weapon. And obviously we all know the bull in her claims about how she wants to see "comprehensive background checks", and close the "online loophole", and close the "gun show loophole". Just come out and what you mean... You "would like to see private firearms transfers subjected to background checks", and then tell us how that is going to get guns out of the hands of dangerous criminals (here's a clue... it isn't.)!
eta: I wish that someone would press her to define the difference between "gun ownership" and "bearing arms" then watch her squirm