TexasCHLforum.com

I agree with the concept of denying ISIS' use of the transcript to further their propaganda efforts, but in the grown up world there may be a better way than just editing out those references. (Isis has already jumped on messaging, taking credit for his actions anyway).

I'd suggest counter-messaging that:

- discredits him: highlights his scatterbrained references to multiple extremist groups, some of whom are opposed to each other & on opposite sides of the Syrian conflict (Hamas vs AQ vs ISIS), or associating his 'stop bombing my country ' remark with his father's delusional skits regarding Afghanistan on the internet; and demonize his attack coinciding with the month of Ramadan; and

- discredit ISIS' claiming credit for his attack: highlighting his 'solidarity' with the Boston Marathon bombers, who pledged their'solidarity'with Hamas; Hamas is fighting FOR Syrian President Assad, who is fighting AGAINST Isis.

I'm not a messaging genius, but this is how a Varsity Team might approach it, rather than just redacting & lip service. This is just what I came up with from reading the news thus far; imagine what a team of talented professionals at the National/ Strategic level might produce (..or not...)