Search found 3 matches

by Eveett Walker
Sat Sep 05, 2015 4:49 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Case Law 30:06
Replies: 12
Views: 1255

Re: Case Law 30:06

Ok. so there have been related suits pointed toward Inadequate Security. That makes sense and explains why an activist attorney I know couldn't find any reference to PC 30:06 in WestlawNext. Still, it might be useful to document the presence of such signs at the time high profile events take place. Corporations hate negative press almost as much as lawsuits.
by Eveett Walker
Sat Sep 05, 2015 4:27 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Case Law 30:06
Replies: 12
Views: 1255

Re: Case Law 30:06

I didn't see a forum that looked more appropriate. If it's the wrong forum, delete it, of course.
by Eveett Walker
Sat Sep 05, 2015 2:50 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Case Law 30:06
Replies: 12
Views: 1255

Case Law 30:06

Is anybody aware of any case law dealing with criminal attacks in places that provide effective notice of criminal trespass with CHL? It would seem that somebody would have already tested the waters regarding injury sustained because a business deprived individuals of a publicly available remedy- the means of self defense and neglected to provide an adequate substitute=effective security? So far, the only information available is the insistence of Internet Experts that no such case has been Won, the implication that no such case has ever even been filed and therefore never will be.

With Fundraiser /Activists harassing corporations to forbid licensed carry, it might be advisable to photographically document the presence of 30:06 signs immediately after a high profile shooting event to establish that the signs were present when the event took place- in case the concern removes the signs later to avoid potential liability or unwanted media coverage.

Return to “Case Law 30:06”