TexasCHLforum.com

During my CHL Instructor's Course the DPS Officer defined "intoxication - for THE purpose of carrying a handgun" is defined as, "The consumption of ANY substance that CAN cause impairment." That means any drug, alcohol, etc. I wanted further clarification on this so I did some re...

jmra/Keith B,

Thank you. That is a good interpretation of the law that makes sense. It was definitely not covered that way at my Instr Course!! I had never heard of or thought about the "mall" example. I think I'll use that and give different examples.

Thanks again.

TAM/Howdy, Agreed. I see this as probably highly unenforceable and dubious that a jury would have issues with that situation. But I'm curious if anyone else has run into the same issues teaching that particular section. I try to be very black & white when I teach the laws and this one always has...

Fellow instructors, I have a question I'm hoping someone can give me some clarification on. Specifically, regarding PC46.03(a)(1) and more specifically the statement, "...any grounds or building on which an activity sponsored by a school or educational institution is being conducted..." Wh...

I was at the Conference earlier this week, THANK YOU Mr. Cotton, great information. I had a question I'm hoping someone can clarify. As I'm reading through the forum(s) and asking a few other instructors I know, I'm finding a little bit of a difference in understanding the new training requirements ...