Not only are they invalid, they are silly. It is a gun event where attendees are there specifically to possess guns, ammo and beanie babies while eating sausage, just goes beyond ridiculous. The law states owned, nothing about what the govt agency is doing with it except for specific uses such as courts, jails, etc.Dr. Jekyl wrote:Where does that leave us in the argument about whether 30.06 postings at the gun shows in the GRB or Pasadena Convention Center are valid? It would seem, based on the above, that they are invalid since City of Houston owns GRB and City of Pasadena owns Pasadena Convention Center.Kalrog wrote:There is some difference of opinion on that one around these parts. The majority feel that you read the law the way it is written and that 30.06 cannot be enforced if a property is owned by a governmental agency. And that 30.06 cannot be enforced if a property is leased by a governmental agency. Either one is enough to render a 30.06 sign unenforceable.DoubleActionCHL wrote:But does "owned by a governmental entity" supercede "leased by a private corporation?"
Search found 1 match
Return to “Houston Theater District”
- Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:42 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Houston Theater District
- Replies: 48
- Views: 4658