TexasCHLforum.com

JALLEN wrote:

Jago668 wrote:
I find it funny that you think a LTC holder should have to obey the law, yet a property owner shouldn't.

The property owner is obeying law law. A sign is not required, being merely only one of three ways provided by statute to give "effective notice" the predicate for criminal liability to be imposed on the carrier who does not leave upon receiving it.

The Wall said he thought any no gun sign should be the same as the property owner verbally notifying you. That is not the law, yes the law provides 3 ways for me to receive effective notice. However a gunbuster sign is not one of those 3 ways.

The Wall wrote:In my opinion the posting of any sign that tells you guns aren't allowed is the same as them telling you in person. Just because they don't have the 30.06 or 30.07 sign doesn't give you the right to carry on their premises. Just means you will have to leave when you get caught and you are supporting a business that doesn't want you to be there. No different than having a No Pets sign, or No Shirt, No Shoes, No service sign. IMHO

I understand not wanting to do business with them. Them not having a 30.06/07 sign does indeed allow me to carry on their premises. Just like if you don't put a sign up that says No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service sign I can walk right in without those items on. Now of course if I get asked to leave that is a different story. Texas law has a requirement for a property owner to keep LTC holders from carrying on his property. It is the property owners responsibility to put those up if they do not want people carrying. It isn't even like the information is difficult to find.

I find it funny that you think a LTC holder should have to obey the law, yet a property owner shouldn't.