TexasCHLforum.com

Bitter Clinger wrote: But I scored! Once again, we fail to agree on anything!

OK, so your mission in life is complete... might as well quit while you are ahead.

Bitter Clinger wrote:Deleted: Meme about trusting Intelligence agencies

Close, but no cigar. It makes sense to trust (but not necessarily "blindly believe") our intelligence agencies but not to expect they should predict our elections.

Soccerdad1995 wrote:Unfortunately, I don't know that there are any truly unbiased news organizations out there right now. If I want to understand what Trump is saying, I'll look at his Twitter feed. If I want commentary I will watch the "news" shows but need to understand and adjust for the bias of the source.

Yes, it seems to me that the media was much less biased (remember Cronkite, Huntley-Brinkley?) but I do think PBS is pretty objective (except when Brooks and Shields are on, maybe) and Time Magazine is highly respected. Ah well...

OK, thanks for the feedback, especially the serious ones. I've been checking out some of the Internet prospects that many have mentioned and will continue to do so. Some of these are really nasty though and make me worry about the kind of material that is becoming so popular.
Thanks again!

Where do you go for reliable, objective, comprehensive, and accurate reporting of the days events?

There are a zillions of op-eds and we all have our favorite one but I'm curious what folks rely on to get a good unbiased report of what's going on? Ok, I'll admit I depend a lot on the Austin-American Statesman newspaper, Time, PBS (Charlie Rose especially) and Morning Joe (Scarborough) for reporting and review. What's better?