Search found 3 matches

by jason812
Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:47 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Restriction of rights and left/liberalism versus right/conservatism.
Replies: 27
Views: 6652

Re: Restriction of rights and left/liberalism versus right/conservatism.

03Lightningrocks wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:33 pm
jason812 wrote: Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:23 pm
srothstein wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 11:25 pm
And this gets me to what I think a crime should be. The only crimes that we should have are those where my actions cause harm to another person. It might be physical injury, it might be financial injury, and it might be mental injury (though this last requires extreme care - offending someone is not an injury but threatening them is). And if there is not a specific person that can be shown to be harmed, it should not be a crime. So, to use the previously mentioned DWI example, driving with any alcohol in your system should not be illegal unless it causes an accident. A distinct near miss causing a person to think the accident was imminent though they took action to avoid it could still be illegal, but just driving home from the bar with no close calls or accidents would be fine even if the driver's BAC was .24.
:iagree: With all you wrote but especially this. Have you noticed generally a crime against the government is punished harsher than a physical crime against a fellow man?

Maybe I'm a Constitutionalist and not Libertarian. I could almost call the Libertarian party the anarchy party. No borders would be just that, anarchy. While we have too many laws, they seem to want no laws.
I was with you all the up to the part about DWI/DUI. Unfortunately there are a VERY large number of folks out there who would drive intoxicated if not for the threat of going to jail. Driving is NOT a right, it is a privilege and as such is a legitimate activity to be regulated by laws. Waiting until some idiot kills my family to put a stop to them driving under the influence just does not cut it.
I forgot to cut out the DWI part. That would be the same as saying its OK to shoot a gun in the air on the courthouse square and as long as the bullets didn't hit anybody, you good. There is potential to harm someone but thats harder to figure out. Some traffic laws are needed but not all. If you don't want to wear a seat belt, fine with me, just don't ask me to pay for the straw for your wheelchair when you become a lawn dart out the windshield.
by jason812
Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:23 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Restriction of rights and left/liberalism versus right/conservatism.
Replies: 27
Views: 6652

Re: Restriction of rights and left/liberalism versus right/conservatism.

srothstein wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 11:25 pm
And this gets me to what I think a crime should be. The only crimes that we should have are those where my actions cause harm to another person. It might be physical injury, it might be financial injury, and it might be mental injury (though this last requires extreme care - offending someone is not an injury but threatening them is). And if there is not a specific person that can be shown to be harmed, it should not be a crime. So, to use the previously mentioned DWI example, driving with any alcohol in your system should not be illegal unless it causes an accident. A distinct near miss causing a person to think the accident was imminent though they took action to avoid it could still be illegal, but just driving home from the bar with no close calls or accidents would be fine even if the driver's BAC was .24.
:iagree: With all you wrote but especially this. Have you noticed generally a crime against the government is punished harsher than a physical crime against a fellow man?

Maybe I'm a Constitutionalist and not Libertarian. I could almost call the Libertarian party the anarchy party. No borders would be just that, anarchy. While we have too many laws, they seem to want no laws.
by jason812
Thu Nov 19, 2020 10:50 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Restriction of rights and left/liberalism versus right/conservatism.
Replies: 27
Views: 6652

Re: Restriction of rights and left/liberalism versus right/conservatism.

Just don't equate right/conservative with the republican party.

Return to “Restriction of rights and left/liberalism versus right/conservatism.”