TexasCHLforum.com

Vol Texan wrote: ↑Fri Sep 11, 2020 12:07 pm

jason812 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 11, 2020 11:27 am
Its called Constitutional Carry.

I may be wrong here, but I think there is a difference. Vermont has Constitutional (no permit required) Carry but “no guns”signs still have force of law.

I wouldn't call that Constitutional Carry but I get your point and could see having to put language in a bill to make all signs unenforceable.

I like the class action lawsuit idea against this group. Not as a way to get any money from them but to turn the table so to speak and force them to bleed money thru legal fees. Much the same way that has been done to pro-gun organizations. Does there lawsuit slander all of us with a texas3006.com login and who have added entries? If so, my feelings are hurt and I'm going to go hide in a safe spot. Now I'm on record claiming my emotional distress.

Vol Texan wrote: ↑Fri Sep 11, 2020 11:19 am Well, there is a simple solution to make the entire suit moot:

Make it such that no variant of any “no guns” sign has the force of law. Call it the “Florida technique”, or the “Georgia provision”, or the “most-places-in-Montana-except-that-liberal-infested-pit-named-Missoula” accord.

Its called Constitutional Carry.