Search found 2 matches

by The Wall
Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:06 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Replies: 19
Views: 15461

Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?

superchief wrote:Why limit it to LTC holders? Tell your representatives to support the "Hearing Protection Act" and let freedom ring!
Be careful of what you wish for. When they find out how well they work it may become mandatory for all guns. :lol: Where I live, every year residence complain about the noise from the duck hunters. It has been brought up to require suppressors on their guns. Amazing how the sound carries over the water. Doesn't bother me.
by The Wall
Sun Jan 15, 2017 10:59 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?
Replies: 19
Views: 15461

Re: Silencer should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?

I don't know why they need to be registered, regulated or licensed period for anyone. I wish people would quit calling them silencers. There's no such thing. They suppress not silence. And without the right ammo they don't do a very good job of that either. Why don't they license and register camouflaged guns since they are harder to see? Just liked suppressed guns are harder to hear.

Return to “Supressor should be allowed for LTC/ CHL holder?”