TexasCHLforum.com

The Speaker said last night before shutting down that they would be on the Local, consent, and resolutions calender today. SB 11 and HB 910 aren't on it. All Senate bills.

They also have to give reason for restrictions in certain areas. It's not an opt out per say from the way I read the amendment. Read the amendment.

Ruark wrote:Will somebody please state, in plain language, what "engrossment" means?

I think it means as a whole or in it's entirety. Bill plus amendments.

Does it have to make it through a third reading now?

I see amendment 5 and 6 passed. Davis and Zerwa

H Nonrecord vote recorded in Journal. What's that mean? it just past to engrossment.

There are lots of other bills behind SB 11 that won't get heard either if they don't knock off this bull. I'm sure glad I don't have to vote for any these idiots. From what I've seen it's always the same ones. I haven't seen my Rep. playing in these games and better not if he wants to continue getting my vote.

Now we're getting a history lesson.

He said this is last amendment.

So about 200 then.

Anyone know how many amendments there are going to be?

I saw him getting ready.

yes

I think there's a motion to suspend rules so they can continue with the eligible for concurrence calender.