I agree with Charles that many of the arguments presented in favor of Open Carry are pure conjecture. Ultimately, what it boils down to for me is that unless there's a good reason to prohibit something it should not be prohibited. And there's no good reason why Open Carry should be prohibited.
In fact, I think the primary value of legalizing Open Carry is in its symbolic/PR value. It will be demoralizing to the anti-gun forces. And in a few years when the Wild West has not returned (yet again), they'll have even less credibility than they do now.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.”
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 11:41 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86728
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 7:41 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86728
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Breitbart Texas article two days ago
Calendars Committee Todd Hunter (R-Corpus Christi) has told this writer repeatedly he will move any pro-gun bills through Calendars to the House Floor for a vote.
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 3:24 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86728
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Is it fair to assume that he only has the political capital to sabotage one of bills (Open Carry or Campus Carry) and not both? If so, which bill is it more likely he'll sabotage?
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 1:38 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86728
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Definitely seems like Abbott is sending a strong "don't block me on this or I will block you on stuff you want" signal.RHenriksen wrote:That's a very good question. Abbott has been tweeting & FB posting on OC regularly, and posted about 'getting his pen warmed up' to sign it, and immediately posted the minute is passed the third reading in the Senate this am.
I interpret this as his trying to nudge the House (ie, Strauss) into allowing it to the floor for a vote. If they sit on it, then IMO the odds of it going to a special session would be pretty strong.