TexasCHLforum.com

I'm guessing the DPS would absorb the CHL renewal cost for instructors since the law says they 'shall issue' (means they must issue) it as part of the instructor certification process.

apostate wrote:

louisf1 wrote: I agree, paying to be an instructor and paying for the normal CHL seems like double jeopardy.

I think you may be confused about the meaning of double jeopardy. http://www.heritage.org/constitution/am ... f-property" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

louisf1 wrote: You have to be licensed in order to be an instructor

Since when? I ask in all sincerity because that wasn't a requirement when I became an instructor.

I see in HB2909 (Sept. 1997, 75th legislative session) where it says the DPS shall issue a license to carry a concealed handgun..to any person who is certified as a qualified handgun instructor...I think it's in Section 12 where it amends sections 18(c) and (f) of Article 4413(29ee), Revised Statutes.