TexasCHLforum.com

cb1000rider wrote:

jb2012 wrote: Yes I am talking about the one pitched to us in our class, and yeah you are probably 100% right, but the "story" was that the service contacted the landlord and took care of the situation. I have no idea if they actually would, just a thought!

My understanding about the one that was pitched in your class is that they're not going to take up any legal issue on your behalf unless it involves drawing a firearm. That may run contrary to what was pitched in your class, but I'll bet you find it in the fine print.

They may not contact the landlord, but I wouldn't be surprised if they did. They contacted a law school in Houston following the passage of SB 11 and they contacted the Houston Zoo just before the originally took down their 30.06 signs. There weren't any uses of a firearm in those instances, and I don't know if they were spurred by any of their members to make those communications, but I honestly think that the attorneys who work with that group are probably more like typical pro-gun folks than the snake oil salesmen they are portrayed as.