WildBill wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2019 7:35 am
I read that the judge was found not guilty because the prosecution couldn't prove it was a gun. All they had was video evidence.
It makes me wonder if the employee would have been found guilty if the original judge presided over the trial.
Wasn't just video, two deputies were there and said it was a gun. They said they didn't arrest him immediately because they weren't sure whether judges could carry in the courthouse or not.
He had a bench trial as well, and the judge ruled in his favor.