TexasCHLforum.com

Interesting OpEd about Collin adopting the School Marshal program.

"Interesting" in that it isn't a knee-jerk condemnation. And in the DMN!

Hold off on that hot take — here’s why Collin College’s plan for gun-carrying staffers makes sense

Flightmare wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 3:41 pm It's very possible that the person writing the article did not understand that there is a difference between the 2 models. While I would have preferred the guardian model (less cost and less restrictive on the district), I will admit that it's better than hockey pucks or river rocks. That being said...with this being a public school, campus carry is fine with the exception of limited prohibited locations.

Yup. I left a comment at the site mentioning the difference. And you are right, small steps forward are better than no steps forward.

I have found an article where the author of the School Marshal legislation says he believes there are 20-50 schools that have adopted the Marshal plan, but I have my doubts. He also appears opposed to changing the legislation to make (in my view) the Marshal plan a workable solution.

https://www.texastribune.org/2018/07/13 ... -teachers/

Very interesting to hear.

I wonder why they went with the School Marshal Program? That is very restrictive compared to the Guardian Program model.


Also, the linked article contains this : "The school marshal program is implemented in 170 public school districts …"

That's not true. Last I looked, there is only one ISD that uses the marshal program, all the rest (and there are more than 200 now) use the Guardian model. Makes me wonder if either the school or the person who wrote that article are confused about those programs.