The Governor's website lists bills he has signed here: https://gov.texas.gov/news/category/signature-statement
Bills vetoed here: https://gov.texas.gov/news/category/leg ... -statement (Altho there are a number of bills listed as vetoed, so far they all appear to be from last session.)
Bills filed with no signature: https://gov.texas.gov/news/category/leg ... -signature (again, nothing from current legislature as of this posting.)
Search found 2 matches
Return to “SB 2065 - Conference Committee Report Filed - PASSED”
- Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:59 pm
- Forum: 2017 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: SB 2065 - Conference Committee Report Filed - PASSED
- Replies: 33
- Views: 24464
- Wed May 31, 2017 11:21 am
- Forum: 2017 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: SB 2065 - Conference Committee Report Filed - PASSED
- Replies: 33
- Views: 24464
Re: SB 2065 - Conference Committee Report Filed - PASSED
"...on the premises of a church, synagogue, or other established place of religious worship."
So if the church holds a social on the grounds of a local park, it sounds like they would not be able to use their volunteer security team because a) it is not an "established place of worship" and b) it's a social not "religious worship" (or is it?)?
If they throw up a tent in park and hold revival services for a week, does that qualify as an "established place of religious worship?"
I think it is good that this bill passed, I don't think the security company lobby should have a monopoly on providing security in this state, but I hope we don't hear anymore harrumphing against "carve outs" for emergency services personnel and the like, because this bill is certainly establishes a big "carve-out". :)
So if the church holds a social on the grounds of a local park, it sounds like they would not be able to use their volunteer security team because a) it is not an "established place of worship" and b) it's a social not "religious worship" (or is it?)?
If they throw up a tent in park and hold revival services for a week, does that qualify as an "established place of religious worship?"
I think it is good that this bill passed, I don't think the security company lobby should have a monopoly on providing security in this state, but I hope we don't hear anymore harrumphing against "carve outs" for emergency services personnel and the like, because this bill is certainly establishes a big "carve-out". :)